Archive for December, 2004

The Use of Power in Small Things

The story that caught my eye this morning was on the express train that Israel is building between Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. The planners want to tunnel under the Latrun salient, which is part of the occupied territories. They also want to dig a bit beyond the Green Line at the Mevasseret Zion settlement, which is a Jewish enclave just outside Jerusalem. Ha’aretz reports that

Several months ago, Attorney General Menahem Mazuz froze plans for the section between the Daniel intersection and Jerusalem in order to research the legal implications of building tracks beyond the Green Line. The subcommittee for roads of the government’s Supreme Planning Council in Judea and Samaria submitted the investigation request to Mazuz, asking him to examine land rights, and determine whether building the tunnels within the territories violates international law.

The Justice Ministry said that Mazuz demanded that “planning and operational steps be taken to allow the rail infrastructure of the State of Israel to be connected in the future to the rail infrastructure serving the residents of Judea, Samaria and the Gaza Strip.” In this way, apparently, Mazuz sought to comply with international law requirements that any use of occupied territory should benefit its residents.

Happily, the Justice Department approved the request.

I must admit that on first reading this, for a moment, I thought Mazuz envisioned a rail line that would cross between the Palestinian and Israeli states after a peace settlement - allowing Palestinians to commute into Israeli cities. But note that he refers to Judea and Samaria (standard Sharon-government usage for the West Bank, connoting Israel’s biblical right to the land). And note that this would contradict the policy of separation that Sharon has embraced.

Unfortunately, it looks more like Israel wants to preserve the option of rail stops in Latrun and Mevasseret Zion. This, in effect, broadcasts Israel’s intention of ignoring the Green Line in its territorial planning.

Al Jazeerah quotes Palestinian cabinet minister Saib Uraiqat saying that

any Israeli building in the territories occupied in 1967 is illegal according to international law. “This rail route is part of an Israeli policy of creating a permanent occupation and this policy will undermine any possibilities of reaching a peace agreement.”

Little good it does him to say so.

These small things, almost as much as the military raids and house demolitions, illustrate how powerless the Palestinians are under the occupation. We feel no obligation to go to any Palestinian body to ask for permission to dig. Presumably, Israel’s Justice Department balances the competing interests without any input from the Palestinians and rules, “objectively”, in Israel’s favor.

Processes like this probably harm Israel even more than they do the Palestinians. They subvert the meaning of law, turning it into a gloss on the exercise of power. Ultimately, oppression destroys the oppressor.

It is noteworthy, too, that Israel does feel constrained by international law. This underlines the importance of international involvement in the conflict.

Prime Lots on the West Bank - Going Cheap

Reporter Steven Erlanger had articles on Jayyous yesterday in the New York Times and the International Herald Tribune. It looks like he went there to survey residents on the upcoming election and instead got an earful about the land grab, which is their overriding concern at the moment.

Briefly, Jayyous is a Palestinian farming village outside the Green Line. Last year the Israeli security wall was built through the middle of the town, separating farmers from their fields. The gates are open for one hour, twice per day, and the permits that are required to pass through are issued selectively. Many farmers have been unable to tend their fields. The town’s livelihood is in serious jeopardy. Now, it would appear that an Israeli settlement inside the wall, Zufim, is seizing fields belonging to Jayyous’ farmers for its own expansion project. See my earlier post for details.

The Times reports:

Tawfiq Salim, 57, owns prime land with his brother, Jamil, that is the center of a dispute roiling the village and beyond. On Dec. 10, bulldozers acting for an Israeli company uprooted nearly 650 of their olive trees, some of them 600 years old, he said. The men at the controls said the land, which lies on the Israeli side of the barrier, belonged to the company…

Talya Somech, the Israeli spokeswoman for the Civil Administration Office for the West Bank, said that the District Coordination and Liaison Office, to which the Salims complained, immediately ordered the work to stop pending investigation.

The head of civil administration talked to both sides and found that a Jayyous resident sold the land to the Israeli company in a deal approved in June 2003. The company had a permit to uproot the trees.

“The relocation of the trees was carried out in keeping with the permit, which was legally issued to the owner of the plot, as registered in the Land Registry,” Ms. Somech said.

The residents of Jayyous assert that they never sold their land to any developer. Salim says the Israeli company that is plowing up his land is using an inaccurate map. He is planning to file suit in the Israeli courts.

What company are we talking about? The New York Times doesn’t say. But David Bloom, who has followed the story closely for an independent magazine called World War III Report, reports:

In a Dec. 15 Ha`aretz article by Akiva Eldar, he mentions that Ge`ulat Haaretz is the “yazam,” or developer, and the contractor, “kablan” in Hebrew, is LIDAR. For some reason, Ge`ulat`s relationship to LIDAR is mentioned in the Hebrew-language edition of Ha`aretz, but any mention of LIDAR has been censored from the English-language edition.

Bloom also says that Lidar is owned by Lev Leviev, a Russian Jew active in the Lubavitcher sect (I was not able to find other sources to confirm the involvement of Lidar, or that Leviev owns Lidar). If Bloom’s report is true, it would cast the situation in an interesting light. In January Ha’aretz listed Leviev as one of Israel’s five wealthiest people, with a net worth of one and a half to two billion dollars.

Leviev made his fortune in the diamond business. Specifically, according to Professional Jeweler magazine, when de Beers started to limit its dealings in Angola because of concerns over “conflict diamonds”, Leviev stepped in and signed an exclusive partnership with the Angolan govenment for diamond mining and distribution.

The Angolan government…began rethinking its relationship with De Beers and other diamond buyers. This occurred after De Beers stopped buying open-market diamonds in Angola in October 1999, concerned that illicit diamond trading that funded civil war could be tainting legal production. In early 2000, Angola created a single channel of distribution to control production. A new company, Angola Selling Corp. (or Ascorp), was formed to market rough diamonds bought from small- to large-scale mining operations and independent miners. Ascorp is a joint venture of Angola which owns half and Leviev and Omega Diamonds of Antwerp, Belgium, who each control about a quarter. Leviev, who reportedly sold the concept of Ascorp to Angola, came away with the job of marketing Angolan diamonds.

A Forbes Magazine profile makes him out to be quite well-connected.

Leviev, who now lives in Bnei Brak, an ultra-Orthodox enclave in Israel, is a close associate of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and the presidents of Kazakhstan and his native Uzbekistan. Among his pals in Africa are presidents José Eduardo Dos Santos of Angola and Sam Nujoma of Namibia.

Leviev does have an interest in real estate - he is an owner of Africa Israel, the construction company that was awarded the government contract to build the Cross-Israel Highway. Africa Israel also made headlines recently by purchasing the Chase Manhatten Building in New York for $170 million.

So - is an Israeli billionaire pulling strings to displace Palestinian farmers for a profitable development project?

The Israeli govenment has taken steps in Jayyous whose end result is to devalue the land for its owners: making it difficult for them to access their fields, uprooting their orchards, threatening their water supply, blocking their access to urban markets both in Israel and in the West Bank, and flooding existing markets with underpriced Israeli-grown produce. One effect of these actions could be to impoverish the farmers to the extent that they are willing to sell their land at a loss. The beneficiaries would be developers who can buy the land cheaply and re-sell it to Israelis for housing.

Whether Lev Leviev is involved or not, the situation serves as a reminder that running underneath the issues of politics and security are economic interests. With no state of their own, and no electoral voice in the Jewish state, the Palestinians are a disempowered people. They are sitting on some valuable West Bank resources. If well-connected Israelis decided they could make a profit off their land, would it come as a suprise that the Palestinians find themselves with the short end of the stick?

Mustafa Barghouti Arrested

The BBC and Al Jazeerah reported this afternoon that Israel arrested Palestinian presidential candidate Mustafa Barghouti on a campaign stop in East Jerusalem. Barghouti is running second to Mahmoud Abbas in the polls.

As I have noted previously, Barghouti is a pacifist. He is associated with the Palestinian National Initiative, a third party distinct from Fath and Hamas. Barghouti is a physician and an advocate of non-violent resistance to the occupation. He is well respected in Israel and in the territories. He has no ties to militants and has never been involved in illegal activity of any sort. He is a very distant cousin of jailed activist Marwan Barghouti.

Mustafa Barghouti was also beaten up at a checkpoint in early December. The reason given by the Jerusalem police for today’s arrest was that “he has the right to transit through Jerusalem but not be in Jerusalem itself”. That right has been reserved rather arbitrarily for Israel’s favored candidate, Mahmound Abbas.

Since East Jerusalem can vote in the Palestinian election, all the candidates should be allowed to campaign there. Harassing the candidates interferes with the democratic process that Israel claims to support in the Palestinian territories. It also undermines Israel’s own image as a western-style democracy. I don’t know about you, but leaders who subject their opponents to arrest, detention and beating make me think more of Stalin than Jefferson.

Maybe we need an international conference to help strengthen Israel’s democratic institutions.

Election Update

The votes have been counted now for most of the local council elections in the occupied territories. In a sure sign that the Arab world has not yet embraced democracy, more than 80% of eligible voters cast ballots.

Fatah is claiming 66% of the vote, but Hamas exceeded expectations by winning majorities in nine (possibly twelve) of twenty-six councils, which was what made headlines.

Most of the media focused on the Hamas-terrorism angle. Only the Christian Science Monitor’s Ben Lynfield thought to drive around the West Bank and ask the locals what they thought.

“This is the first time Hamas will take responsibility in the society,” says Hafez Barghouthi, editor of the Palestinian Authority (PA) affiliated al-Hayat al-Jadida newspaper. “It is the first time it will have to go beyond criticism of the PA, to work in the field like a party responsible for coordinating daily life, and as a party with a duty to society.”

[I]n the view of Hisham Ahmed, a political scientist at Bir Zeit University, the results of the local elections can be viewed as an expression of dissatisfaction with Mr. Abbas… “No longer can one group declare it has the exclusive power in Palestinian society,” Ahmed says.

Here is Huda al-Asa, newly elected as a town councilor in Obadeiah.

“Hamas and Fatah should work together now. I have run to serve my town, not to deal with politics. My priority would be to serve the women and children in general,” says the diminutive and soft-spoken Ms. Asa, wearing a navy blue hijab. “Our platform calls for building a public library and a medical compound.”

Asa, a nurse who is a mother of five, says it was her experience running a charitable association, the Abadiya Women’s Society, along with the two other women candidates, that contributed to her appeal. “I used to volunteer during sieges and closures, helping women deliver babies and helping injured people,” she says.

All politics is local.

The Palestinian Presidential race also kicked off today. The U.S. papers were quite impressed that the candidates all campaigned under Arafat’s banner (literally, in some cases). The LA Times opened with:

Anyone who didn’t know better might have thought that Yasser Arafat was alive and well and running for Palestinian Authority president.

Why so suprised? The Palestinians don’t particularly care that we’ve labelled Arafat corrupt, a terrorist, etc. To them, he was a great leader. He dedicated his life to Palestinian statehood. He symbolizes their national cause. They forgive him his faults. He’s their David Ben-Gurion (and Ben-Gurion wasn’t such a saint either, by the way). Arafat’s legacy is the starting point for this campaign.

Mahmoud Abbas, in speeches in Ramallah and Bethlehem, outlined his platform thus (as reported in The New York Times):

We are choosing the path of peace and negotiation. If there is no peace here, there will be no peace in the Middle East or the rest of the world.

Israel must pull out of all Palestinian lands occupied in 1967. We cannot compromise on Jerusalem. A state that is cut up by settlements cannot be a state. It will be cantons.

If Israel wants peace, then the prisoner issue must be settled. We want everyone to be a former prisoner, above all else Marwan Barghouti.

And with regard to Hamas and Islamic Jihad,

They told us you have to uproot them. We will not uproot. They told us you have to strike them. We will not strike. They are part of our people, and we will include them.

Hardly anyone here is bothering to report on the other candidates, but Al Jazeerah did a piece the other day on Musafa Barghouti.

“We don’t need a leader who will control us, because we are all languishing under the Israeli occupation. We need a leader who will lead us to freedom and liberation”.

[Barghouti] said he was not running against Fatah per se, saying the movement had in its ranks “many good and patriotic people. But I represent the silent majority which is thirsty for ending this shocking subservience to Israel.”

Al-Barghuthi said Palestinians should never agree to sit down alone with Israel at the negotiating table. “This is like entrusting the lamb to the tiger. We know what would happen in such a situation. Hence, we must insist on an international conference based on UN resolutions and the ruling of the International Court of Justice at the Hague”.

Like Abbas, Barghouti is a pacifist, but he favors more active grassroots resistance to the occupation. He has been effective in mobilizing international volunteers to join Palestinians. He is also more focused than Abbas on social welfare and on building the civil state. The analysis is that he could make a good showing if he captures the Islamist vote plus some of the younger, discontented Fatah members.

Merry Christmas, Marty

Well what do you know? Neoconservative icon and Middle East forum mainstay Martin Kramer is taking a Christmas break. Silly me. I thought he was Jewish.

Blair’s Diplomacy

Do you remember December 7, 2004? Oh, you must. That’s the day all the newspapers announced that Israel, the Palestinians, Egypt, the U.S. and Europe had reached a comprehensive solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It was in Ha’aretz, on the AP wires. They were talking about a multilateral peace conference in Washington in the Spring. There was a feeling of optimism and hope.

Well, the blush sure is off that rose. The conference got moved from Washington to London. Israel isn’t going to participate. And they’re not going to talk about a settlement at all. They’re going to focus instead on reforming the Palestinian Authority. At his press conference in Ramallah, Blair said:

First of all, let me make it very clear what we can and can’t do. There is a Conference envisaged by the Road Map which is the Conference at which there are discussions about the final status negotiation. That is not for me to undertake. What we can do, however, is to make sure that after the Presidential election and with the disengagement being what we want to be which is the first step of the process towards creating a viable Palestinian State, we can help with the development of those institutions necessary on the Palestinian side to create that viable state.

Abbas embraced the Blair’s proposal. He didn’t really have much choice, since aid from the World Bank has been tied to Palestinian reform (read: participation in the Conference). But he did state:

Our political objective is the ending of the occupation that has started in 1967, an independent sovereign Palestinian State and to find a just and agreed upon solution for the issue of the refugees and our strategic orientation and decision is that it is the negotiated solution that we are pursuing.

What we demand from the Israeli side, and what we expect from the Israeli side, is the cessation of aggression against our Palestinian people, and this necessitates the return to stability and order and security and we will fulfil all our commitments to achieve this purpose, and we expect from the Israeli side to stop the building of the wall, to stop the expansion of the settlements, and to release political Palestinian prisoners. All those steps would encourage the Palestinian people to pursue supporting progress on that level.

Ahmed Qureia, the Palestinian Prime Minister, was more blunt.

[W]e are capable and have the means and expertise for peace and negotiations… It is the Israeli side that requires rehabilitation for peace not us… We are in need of a peace conference and not a meeting.

Blair is facing the political reality of two sides that are far apart on the issues and deeply mistrustful of each other. Perhaps it is premature for a full-fledged peace conference. But the Palestinians are not the only ones who need to take substantive steps to end aggression in order to restore trust. Israel has not yet actually evacuated a single settlement in Gaza; and, more importantly, it continues to appropriate Palestinian land in the West Bank for expanding settlements there (see my last post).

I believe that ending terrorist attacks on Israel is the morally right thing for the Palestinians to do. Whether it is strategically right (and whether it will stick) depends very much on Israel’s response and on the pressure that other countries are willing to exert on Israel.

There seems to be a committed leadership on the Palestinian side. Abbas’s demands are not unreasonable. If Sharon is serious about peace, he should halt construction of the wall and take immediate steps to stop the growth of the West Bank settlements. He should also indicate that he is willing, once the initial steps have been taken, to discuss borders and refugees.

If he doesn’t - well, at least we will know who dropped the ball.

Jayyous and Zufim

The Palestinian families living in Jayyous in the West Bank have been there, cultivating the land, for at least six centuries. Some of their olive trees are hundreds of years old.

The local charity society has put up a town web site. It offers this description:

The town has three schools (preparatory school, a secondary school for boys, a secondary school for girls), kindergarten, cultural center, charity society and committee, municipality, two mosques, a health club, and other committees like lands defense committee and women committee. The town has the privilege of its educated youths who are holding high education certificates.

Change “mosques” to “churches” and the committees to the Grange and the Extension Service, and it doesn’t look too different from an American farming town - except for the history.

In 1948, after the Israeli War of Independence, about a fifth of Jayyous’ farmland was occupied and turned over to Israeli farmers. The rest of the village lay just outside the Green Line that marks the border of Israel proper. Then in 2003 the separation wall went right through the village, uprooting 2,500 olive trees and leaving the fields on the Israel side and the town outside. Now the farmers need permits to pass through huge concrete and barbed wire gates to get to their fields, which are between the wall and the Green Line. Only about 40% of the farmers have been issued permits, and 15,000 citrus trees have died untended in the past year.

Jayyous has become a center for non-violent protest against the wall. There are regular demonstrations attended by internationals. However, Jayyous residents who attend these protests soon have their permits revoked, which can lead to penury, as farming and herding are the only source of income for many.

Is Jayyous a hotbed of militancy, a threat to Israel? I was able to find two incidents involving Jayyous residents. Abed al-Khaber Khalid was picked up by the Israeli police for working illegally in Israel in 1998, when he was 18 (he was a carpenter). The soldiers reportedly took him to a field, stripped him and beat him brutally, breaking his arm and jaw. Four years later, he strapped on a bomb and tried unsuccessfully to blow it up at a military base in Israel. Another resident, named Qa’adan, was killed in an armed clash with Israeli soldiers in the West Bank city of Tulkarem in 2002.

Adjacent to the farmland of Jayyous is the Jewish-only settlement of Zufim - outside the Green Line but inside the border drawn by the wall. David Bloom, a Jewish activist and reporter, visited Zufim last year dressed as a religious settler and spoke with a real estate agent.

The agent explained that for the price of a two-bedroom apartment in Tel Aviv, we could get a multiple-bedroom house in Zufim, where the air is clean, you have space, and the children can play. Only 45 minutes’ drive to the center of Tel Aviv, he says, and with the light rail expected to be built from the nearby city of Rana’ana in Israel, it will be a ten minutes drive to the train station, and 20 minutes by train into Tel Aviv.

There is an ever-growing demand for attractive, inexpensive housing within commuting distance of major Israeli cities - so Zufim is expanding. In late November, as reported in The Guardian, Israel began bulldozing 200 acres of fields to build Zufim North, which will consist of 1200 new homes. The fields were confiscated from Jayyous farmers without notice or compensation. A couple of weeks later, according to Haaretz, a gang of settlers from Zufim descended on Jayyous and uprooted 1700 more olive trees:

Villagers said dozens of settlers, some of them armed, entered the olive grove owned by village resident Mohammed Salim at 8 A.M. and started destroying it with a bulldozer. The villagers called on the security forces for help, but police and troops only arrived in the afternoon. The settlers had by then destroyed [the] trees.

It’s clear that the security wall and Israeli expansion are strangling Jayyous. Abdul-Latif Khaled, a groundwater hydrologist with the Palestine Hydrology Group, wrote recently in the Christian Science Monitor:

With thousands of trees uprooted for the construction of the wall and countless trees abandoned for lack of access, we find ourselves in the midst of an environmental disaster.

That disaster is exacerbated by restricted access to water. Jayyous has traditionally relied on six groundwater wells, all of which are now behind the wall, forcing us to purchase water from another village. The loss of our water and farmland has meant the deterioration of the village’s ecosystem and our ability to live on our resources. Once the wall is completed, more than 90 percent of the available water in the West Bank will be on the other side or under Israeli control.

There are economic costs to the wall, too. Merchants from surrounding towns used to purchase directly from the farms, but now farmers must sell their produce in small markets where prices are lower. Between March and July, 15-kilogram boxes of tomatoes that should not sell for less than $3.50 had to be sold for 30 cents. This year’s olive harvest has been similarly dismal. Olive oil that should sell for $5 per kilogram is down to $2 - the break-even price is $3 per kilogram. At these prices, reinvestment in the land isn’t feasible.

Development is accelerating in several other West Bank settlements near the Green Line. Again, from The Guardian:

About 400 more houses are being built around Alfe Menashe settlement, at the heart of an enclave created by a loop in the barrier less than two miles south of Zufim. Trapped inside are five smaller Palestinian communities of about 1,000 people and their land.

A short distance away work has begun on about 50 houses at Nof Sharon on land confiscated from a Palestinian town. In recent months the government has invited tenders to build thousands of houses in big settlements, such as Ariel, and those close to Jerusalem, including Ma’ale Adumim.

Last week government lawyers told the court that living next to Alfe Menashe gave the Palestinians the opportunity to find jobs in the settlement, and so they “were not only not harmed by building the fence but even benefited from it”.

It would appear that Israel is trying to push the Palestinians out of the space between the settlements and the Green Line, on the assumption that the larger West Bank settlements will ultimately be annexed to Israel. This, despite Sharon’s committment in the framework of the “Road Map” to freeze settlement construction.

A lot of American Jews will say, “I support Israel. I want security for Israel. I don’t support the settlements.” Well, while we’re supporting Israel and not supporting the settlements, this is what’s happening. The settlements are not an accident or an exception. They are, and always have been, part of a deliberate strategy to displace the Palestinian population and expand Israel’s borders. This is quite obvious to the Palestinians who are being displaced. They have fought it with all means at their disposal - which is the root of Israel’s security crisis.

Mahmoud Abbas, the almost certain winner in the Palestinian presidential election, has called for an end to Palestinian violence.

The settlement project constitutes a different sort of violence - less dramatic than blowing up a bus full of children but, in its own way, just as horrible. We are destroying not only century-old trees, but the people who cultivated them over generations. Where the parents were self-sufficient farmers, the children will be laborers - if they are lucky enough to find work in the homes of the Israelis who live where the olive groves used to stand.

Gaza notwithstanding, settlement expansion continues unabated in the West Bank. Take a look at the map. Israel plans to keep not only the settlements close to the Green Line, but many that are deep within Palestinian territory.

This is an issue on which American Jews should take a strong stand. It is not enough to say, “we don’t support the settlements”, and then look the other way. We should make our giving contingent on dismantling West Bank settlements and negotiating the return of land to the Palestinians. We should contact our representatives in Congress. We need to say, publically, that we don’t agree. This would send a strong message to Israel that it cannot go on committing these injustices in our name.


About

You are currently browsing the semitism.net weblog archives for the month December, 2004.

Longer entries are truncated. Click the headline of an entry to read it in its entirety.